Spinal Trauma
Introduction to Spinal Trauma in the Canadian Context
Spinal trauma is a critical topic for MCCQE1 preparation, particularly given its prevalence and potential for severe outcomes in the Canadian healthcare system. This comprehensive guide will cover key aspects of spinal trauma, focusing on Canadian guidelines and practices to help you excel in your MCCQE1 exam.
According to the Rick Hansen Institute, approximately 86,000 Canadians are living with spinal cord injury, with 4,300 new cases occurring each year. Understanding spinal trauma is crucial for Canadian medical practitioners.
Anatomy and Physiology Review
Before diving into the specifics of spinal trauma, let's review the key anatomical and physiological concepts relevant to the MCCQE1 exam:
Classification of Spinal Injuries
For MCCQE1 preparation, it's essential to understand the classification of spinal injuries:
-
Mechanism of injury:
- Flexion
- Extension
- Rotation
- Compression
- Distraction
-
Stability:
- Stable injuries
- Unstable injuries
-
Neurological status:
- Complete
- Incomplete
- ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)
The ASIA Impairment Scale is crucial for MCCQE1 exam preparation. Memorize the grades A through E for accurate classification of spinal cord injuries.
Initial Assessment and Management
Primary Survey (ABCDE)
- Airway with cervical spine protection
- Breathing and ventilation
- Circulation with hemorrhage control
- Disability (neurological status)
- Exposure/Environmental control
Secondary Survey
- Detailed neurological examination
- Log-rolling the patient
- Palpation of the entire spine
Diagnostic Imaging in Spinal Trauma
Canadian guidelines for spinal trauma imaging:
- Plain radiographs: Often the initial imaging modality
- CT scan: Gold standard for bony injuries
- MRI: Best for soft tissue injuries, cord compression, and ligamentous injuries
The Canadian C-Spine Rule is widely used in emergency departments across Canada to determine the need for cervical spine imaging in alert and stable trauma patients.
Specific Spinal Injuries
Cervical Spine Injuries
Injury Type | Key Features | Management |
---|---|---|
Atlanto-occipital dislocation | Highly unstable, often fatal | Immediate stabilization, surgical fusion |
Hangman's fracture (C2) | Bilateral C2 pars interarticularis fracture | External immobilization or surgical fixation |
Clay-shoveler's fracture | Avulsion fracture of C6/C7 spinous process | Conservative management |
Central cord syndrome | Upper extremity weakness > lower | Early surgical decompression if deficit persists |
Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries
- Chance fracture
- Burst fracture
- Compression fracture
Management Principles
- Immobilization: Crucial in the pre-hospital and early hospital phase
- Methylprednisolone: No longer routinely recommended in Canada for acute spinal cord injury
- Surgical intervention: Based on injury type, stability, and neurological status
- Rehabilitation: Early involvement of interdisciplinary team
Canadian Guidelines for Spinal Trauma Management
The following guidelines are specific to Canadian healthcare practices:
-
Acute Spinal Cord Injury: The Canadian Spine Society no longer recommends routine use of high-dose methylprednisolone.
-
Cervical Spine Clearance: The Canadian C-Spine Rule is preferred over NEXUS in Canadian emergency departments.
-
Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS): Widely used in Canada for guiding thoracolumbar injury management.
-
Early Rehabilitation: Canadian best practices emphasize early involvement of rehabilitation specialists in acute spinal cord injury management.
Key Points to Remember for MCCQE1
- π Memorize the Canadian C-Spine Rule for cervical spine clearance
- π§ Understand the ASIA Impairment Scale for spinal cord injury classification
- π₯ Know the indications for surgical intervention in spinal trauma
- π Emphasize the importance of pre-hospital immobilization in Canadian EMS protocols
- π©Ί Be familiar with the CanMEDS roles in managing spinal trauma patients, especially as a Medical Expert and Collaborator
Sample Question
A 25-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motor vehicle collision. He complains of neck pain and numbness in both arms. On examination, he has weakness in both upper extremities (3/5 strength) but normal strength in the lower extremities. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- A. Brown-SΓ©quard syndrome
- B. Anterior cord syndrome
- C. Central cord syndrome
- D. Posterior cord syndrome
- E. Complete spinal cord injury
Explanation
The correct answer is:
- C. Central cord syndrome
Central cord syndrome is characterized by greater weakness in the upper extremities compared to the lower extremities. This pattern is typically seen in hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine, particularly in patients with pre-existing cervical spondylosis. The presentation of neck pain, numbness in both arms, and weakness predominantly in the upper extremities is classic for central cord syndrome.
MCCQE1 Tip
Remember the pattern: "Central cord syndrome = arms > legs" for your MCCQE1 exam preparation.
References
-
Noonan, V. K., et al. (2012). Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: A national perspective. Neuroepidemiology, 38(4), 219-226.
-
Fehlings, M. G., et al. (2017). A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: Recommendations on the use of methylprednisolone sodium succinate. Global Spine Journal, 7(3_suppl), 203S-211S.
-
Stiell, I. G., et al. (2001). The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA, 286(15), 1841-1848.
-
Vaccaro, A. R., et al. (2005). A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: The importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine, 30(20), 2325-2333.
-
Canadian Medical Association. (2015). CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.